[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
.If we envisage the problem of esoteric evolution from the point of view ofthe film and the different parts man can play in it, it is clear that this kind ofevolution is impossible as long as the film can always be considered as runningin the same circle.People who perform in such a film are those we have calledanthropoids, puppets, the dead who, in the words of Jesus,  believe themselvesto be alive.Esoteric evolution starts when man, by his conscious efforts,proves capable of breaking the circle and transforming it into an ascendingspiral.(Book I, pp 234-5)For those who aspire to be concious and to learn how to "do" in the esotericsense, must step out of their personal film peopled with Organic Portals.Ittakes two to tango, and generally neither party will find fulfillment.As we have just said, man most often comes to this idea of evolution after hehas already complicated the film to which he belongs.But true evolution, thejourney toward the purity of the centres, especially the emotional centrewhich  at last at the start  is the sole receptacle of  B influences, and seat ofthe magnetic centre, cannot occur while mired in the original film.The heartcannot grow toward purity while engaged in a dance with Organic Portals.Purification of the heart is the sine qua non condition of success.(Book I, p.238)28 HOW AN ORGANIC PORTAL VIEWS THE ORGANIC WORLDFortunately, because the OP can be intelligent, observant, and analytical,and because they appear to include some of our most famous scientists, theyare able to describe for us how they see the world and their interior "life"very accurately and in great detail.At the bottom of this is perhaps the answer as to the source of one of the mostenduring debates of human history i.e.good versus evil.Why is it that there is so much strife in the world, why are so many divided overthe promotion of war or peace, respect or disrespect, environmental protection ordestruction, in short, a purely material self serving outlook or a spiritual serving ofothers outlook?Perhaps we are getting close to the answer, for the truth would seem to be thatthere is not and never has been a homogenous "we" (the human race) on theplanet, "we" are not all alike, "we" do not see the world in the same way, "we" arenot just a divided race, we are two different races.It becomes clearer then why most "top scientists", in their theories, do not considerthe spiritual dimension, or quickly write off any "unconventional" theories.The OPscientist (and just how many OP scientists there are is discussed further below) hasno notion whatsoever of "spirit" or of the existence of higher centres.They areincapable of experiencing these higher centres, and therefore their descriptions ofthe world are lacking them.And because they cannot experience them, they denytheir existence for everyone, including for those who are capable of "seeing" whatthe OP is incapable of seeing.In a materialistic world, where Organic Portals are intheir Natural Element, and Souled Beings are NOT, with Organic Portal sciencedrawing the boundary between what is true and what is false, there is no place forthe Higher realms.It is "false" compared with the self-evident "truth" ofmaterialism as experienced at all levels by the OP.The Organic Portal in his role of scientists is bound to come to a materialisticexplanation for the workings of the universe because that is all they know and areable to see.This is very clear when we look at the question of consciousness itself.The answersare very revealing.The apparent ability of humans to be "self-aware" and the question ofconsciousness is one that has troubled the minds of philosophers, psychologists,scientists and the odd layperson, too, since time immemorial.Today more than29 ever consciousness is one of the most perplexing problems outstanding in science,and one that reflects on our very nature and relation to reality.Western culture has seen various theories put forward as to the nature of humanconsciousness.Most of these can be included in one of two main schools ofthought, i.e.the materialistic, Darwinist, evolutionary/"survival of the fittest"approach which proposes that mind/consciousness is an epiphenomenon whicharises on top of material existence.From this scientific viewpoint the brain is acomputer, with neurons and synapses acting as basic switches and "bits", andconsciousness is thought to "emerge" as a novel property of complex computation.On the other hand, we have the more "spiritually" inclined school of thought,which holds the above to be wholly inadequate in explaining the phenomenon(undoubtedly fuelled by various religious teachings and creeds), and which holds tothe concept of an ethereal spirit inhabiting the body/mind and expressing itself inthe form of consciousness and that this is the fundamental aspect of life.Otherschools mixing and matching from the two also exist.To this point, it is interesting to look at just who are the various exponents onopposing sides of the argument.In one camp we have the many scientists and MDsof various disciplines such as the "neural Darwinism" of Edelman and the "memes"of Dennet and Dawkins [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • przylepto3.keep.pl